ABSTRACT
Introduction/Objective Autopsy represents the gold standard for determining cause and mechanisms of death. With this paper, the authors wanted to acquaint colleagues with our experiences while performing autopsies of COVID-positive deceased patients. Method The study included total of 12 autopsies related to COVID-19 infection, performed in our forensic pathology institution, from which one autopsy of suspected patient and 11 autopsies of confirmed COVID-positive patients. Confirmation of infection was obtained by antemortem polymerase chain reaction analysis of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs and by postmortem swabs taken from upper airways and lungs. Results In five cases, cause of death was directly attributed to COVID-19 infection. In two cases cause of death was due to heart attack, in two cases due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage, in one case due to multiple injuries, in one case due to trauma complications and in one case due to gunshot injury. Conclusion Large number of autopsies in which cause of death has been established to be other than COVID, along with importance of these cases for litigation, strongly emphasizes the importance of forensic autopsy of COVID-positive deceased. If adequate personal protective equipment is used, there should be minimal exposure risk to virus remaining in body tissues. © 2022, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Many studies on COVID-19 outcomes in patients with RMD have either restricted to COVID positive RMD patients or compared them to the general clinic population as a comparator. Given heterogeneity in behaviors and risks, clinical characteristics associated with a positive diagnosis among patients with RMD seeking testing for Sars-CoV-2 remain less well studied. Objectives: Among patients with RMD receiving a Sars-CoV-2 PCR test, we aimed to identify RMD-related factors associated with a positive test result. Methods: Among patients seen at least once in the University of Washington (UW) rheumatology clinics between March 2018 to March 2020, we reviewed electronic medical records to identify patients undergoing Sars-CoV-2 PCR testing from March 1 through October 31, 2020. Patients with RMD were categorized into two groups: those who tested positive for Sars-CoV-2 and those who tested negative. We randomly selected patients from the negative group in a 2:1 ratio for further data abstraction. Student's t-test and Chi-squared tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively, between the groups. To determine the correlates of testing positive for Sars-CoV-2, specifically RMD medication use and disease activity, we constructed different multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, presence of comorbidities, body mass index, and smoking. Results: A total of 2768 RMD patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing within the UW system, of whom 43 (1.5%) were positive at least once. Three patients with incomplete information were excluded. Patients who tested positive had higher prevalence of end stage renal disease (ESRD)/chronic kidney disease (CKD) (24% versus 11%), had higher rates of active disease (24% versus 20%), were older (>55 years) (mean age 57.3 versus 54.8 years), male (63% versus 55%), non-white race/ethnicity (32% versus 26%), and higher prevalence of multiple comorbidities (42% versus 31%) (Table 1). In the multivariable models, neither RMD medication use (versus no use, Table 1) nor high disease activity (vs low disease activity/remission) were statistically significantly associated with COVID-19 positivity. Among the 41 COVID-19 positive patients, a majority recovered without specific treatments, although approximately one third of the positive patients were hospitalized and three deaths were observed. Conclusion: In this study, patients who tested positive did not differ in many ways from those who tested negative. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Importance Preventive interventions are needed to protect residents and staff of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities from COVID-19 during outbreaks in their facilities. Bamlanivimab, a neutralizing monoclonal antibody against SARS-CoV-2, may confer rapid protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Objective To determine the effect of bamlanivimab on the incidence of COVID-19 among residents and staff of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, double-blind, single-dose, phase 3 trial that enrolled residents and staff of 74 skilled nursing and assisted living facilities in the United States with at least 1 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 index case. A total of 1175 participants enrolled in the study from August 2 to November 20, 2020. Database lock was triggered on January 13, 2021, when all participants reached study day 57. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of bamlanivimab, 4200 mg (n = 588), or placebo (n = 587). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was incidence of COVID-19, defined as the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and mild or worse disease severity within 21 days of detection, within 8 weeks of randomization. Key secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate or worse COVID-19 severity and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results The prevention population comprised a total of 966 participants (666 staff and 300 residents) who were negative at baseline for SARS-CoV-2 infection and serology (mean age, 53.0 [range, 18-104] years;722 [74.7%] women). Bamlanivimab significantly reduced the incidence of COVID-19 in the prevention population compared with placebo (8.5% vs 15.2%;odds ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.28-0.68];P < .001;absolute risk difference, -6.6 [95% CI, -10.7 to -2.6] percentage points). Five deaths attributed to COVID-19 were reported by day 57;all occurred in the placebo group. Among 1175 participants who received study product (safety population), the rate of participants with adverse events was 20.1% in the bamlanivimab group and 18.9% in the placebo group. The most common adverse events were urinary tract infection (reported by 12 participants [2%] who received bamlanivimab and 14 [2.4%] who received placebo) and hypertension (reported by 7 participants [1.2%] who received bamlanivimab and 10 [1.7%] who received placebo). Conclusions and Relevance Among residents and staff in skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, treatment during August-November 2020 with bamlanivimab monotherapy reduced the incidence of COVID-19 infection. Further research is needed to assess preventive efficacy with current patterns of viral strains with combination monoclonal antibody therapy. This randomized clinical trial assesses the effect of a single intravenous infusion of bamlanivimab vs placebo on incidence of COVID-19 among residents and staff of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities. Question Among residents and staff of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities with high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, what is the effect of bamlanivimab on the incidence of COVID-19? Findings This randomized phase 3 clinical trial included 966 participants who were residents and staff at US skilled nursing and assisted living facilities with at least 1 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 index case and who were negative at baseline for SARS-CoV-2 infection and serology, enrolled from August to November 2020. The incidence of COVID-19 infection among those treated with bamlanivimab vs placebo was 8.5% vs 15.2%, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant. Meaning Bamlanivimab monotherapy compared with placebo reduced the risk of COVID-19 in residents and staff of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with underlying medical conditions have a greater risk of developing severe COVID-19. Unlike vaccine-derived immunity which develops over time, administration of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies is an immediate, passive humoral immunotherapy, with the potential to reduce disease progression, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and death. Methods: In this phase 3 portion of the BLAZE-1 trial, a high-risk ambulatory cohort of 1035 patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody combination treatment consisting of 2800mg bamlanivimab+2800mg etesevimab together, or placebo, within 3 days of laboratory diagnosis. The primary outcome was overall patient clinical status, measured by the proportion of patients who experienced COVID-19-related hospitalization or death by any cause by Day 29. Results: 1035 patients were randomized and infused (mean age [SD];53.8 years [16.8], female (52%)). A 70% reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalization and death by any cause by Day 29 was observed in patients who received the bamlanivimab+etesevimab combination treatment (11/518 arm total) compared to those who received placebo (36/517 arm total) (Δ[95% CI]=-4.8[-7.4,-2.3])(p=0.0004). No deaths were observed among patients who received the combination treatment, 10 deaths were reported in the placebo group, at least 8 designated COVID-19-related. A significantly greater reduction in log10(viral load) from baseline at Day 7 was observed amongst patients who received bamlanivimab+etesevimab compared to placebo (Δ[95% CI]=-1.20[-1.46,-0.94])(p<0.00000001). The median time to sustained symptom resolution was shorter for those who received the combination treatment (days [95% CI]=8[7.0,8.0]) compared to those who received placebo (days [95% CI]=9[8.0,10.0])(p=0.007). Similar rates of adverse events were observed between placebo (60/517,11.6%) and combination treatment groups (69/518,13.3%). Conclusion: 2800mg bamlanivimab+2800mg etesevimab neutralizing monoclonal antibody combination therapy significantly reduced COVID-19- related hospitalizations and deaths amongst high-risk ambulatory patients and accelerated the decline in viral load and disease symptoms over time. This study confirms that early intervention with bamlanivimab + etesevimab greatly improves the clinical outcomes for high-risk ambulatory patients, and links reduction in nasopharyngeal viral load to clinically meaningful benefits.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected residents of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities. Interventions are urgently needed to protect this vulnerable population. Bamlanivimab is a potent neutralizing monoclonal antibody that binds the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of bamlanivimab in preventing COVID-19. Methods: BLAZE-2 is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study that enrolled residents and staff at skilled nursing and assisted living facilities reporting at least one confirmed SARS-CoV-2 case. Eligible participants received bamlanivimab (4200 mg) or placebo intravenously. Nasal swabs were collected at baseline and weekly through day 57 to determine SARS-CoV-2 infection status via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). COVID-19-releated symptoms and signs were recorded daily. The primary analysis prevention population included participants negative at baseline for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and serology. The primary endpoint was incidence of mild or worse COVID-19 by day 57. Results: Of the 1175 participants dosed, 966 (82.2%) comprised the prevention population. The prevention population included 299 residents for whom the median age was 76 years (range 31-104), 234 (78.3%) were aged ≥65, and 178 (59.5%) were female. All were considered at high risk for development of severe COVID-19. The proportion of residents in the prevention population with mild or worse COVID-19 by day 57 was significantly lower in the bamlanivimab group compared with the placebo group (odds ratio [OR], 0.20;95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.49;p<0.001)(Figure). For this same group, bamlanivimab was associated with significant reductions in the incidence of moderate or worse COVID-19 by day 57 (OR, 0.20;95% CI, 0.08 to 0.49;p<0.001) and incident SARS-CoV-2 infection by day 29 (OR, 0.23;CI, 0.11 to 0.48;p<0.001) compared with placebo. Of the 16 deaths reported during the study, all 5 that were attributed to COVID-19 were in the placebo group. The incidence of both adverse events and serious adverse events were balanced between the bamlanivimab and placebo group. Conclusion: Bamlanivimab was highly effective in reducing the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 infection and was well tolerated. These findings demonstrate the potential beneficial impact of bamlanivimab use on COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among skilled nursing facility residents.